 |
DIAGRAM
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
HARDWARE OVERVIEW
The Command and Data Handling (C&DH) system consists of a flight
computer and five I/O blocks on two daughter boards.
These I/O blocks handle interfacing the computer to all S/C sub-systems.
This hardware primarily consists of digital logic circuitry instantiated
using ACTEL ACT1 FPGA\325s. In cases where large telemetry volumes exist,
FIFO\325s are used for data buffering, thus lowering S/C computer/telemetry
interaction times. Lowering these times is a self-imposed requirement for
the C&DH hardware system that yields lower computer throughput requirements.
All of the unique C&DH circuitry resides on two PC boards that attach
directly to a dedicated port on the S/C computer.
The flight computer used is an SC4A Single Board Spaceflight Computer
developed by Southwest Research
Institute (SwRI). Instrumentation
and Space Research Division. It includes a 16-bit 80C186 central processor
with a clock frequency of 10 MHz. It is MS-DOS and VRTX compatible. The
throughput capacity is estimated at 0.77 MIPS. On-board memory includes
512K Bytes RAM, 256K Bytes EEPROM, and 64K Bytes UVPROM all with error
detection and correction. Up to 24M Bytes of mass memory is also provided.
Communication capability includes 32 12-bit analog input channels, 4 12-bit
analog output channels, a two channel RS-422 Serial I/O port, and 16 input/output
Parallel I/O (total 32). The computer uses memory mapped I/O, providing
16 bit word reads or writes per instruction cycle. Along with interrupts,
this will be the main method of interface to the computer. |
|
|
|
|
 |
SOFTWARE OVERVIEW
The software development language is ANSI C. Development of the software
is on a MS-DOS Intel 80486 personal computer. The development computer
uses the RS-422 port on the SC-4A for loading software and performing operation
simulations. The processor software consists of high-level and low-level
functions that handle all hardware interrupts and timed events. Command
storage and management, data-gathering and housekeeping are all performed
by the software. A modular design constraint is employed to simplify the
software and ease implementation.
SNOE uses a packetized telemetry data scheme based upon the recommendations
by the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS). The CCSDS is an
international organization composed of representatives from the world's
space agencies. Compared to a traditional time-division multiplexed telemetry
system, packetized telemetry systems provide substantial design freedom:
any number of different packets can be developed to hold the spacecraft's
science, engineering and ancillary data. Generating packets sometimes involves
complex sets of functions that are, just as all functions performed by
the SNOE software, grouped into software modules. Since the SNOE software
handles functions traditionally implemented in hardware, the software modules
are called from a main loop that is rigorously deterministic in its timing. |
|
|
|
|
 |
SNOE TELEMETRY
There are two telemetry channels from the SNOE satellite. The first
is a low-rate (512 bits per second) channel that will be used in case of
emergency. The channel has a safety factor of over 9 dB, providing a communication
link in even the most extreme conditions. The 512 bps bandwidth channel
has room for only real-time data, primarily engineering telemetry, leaving
science data and playback data for the high-rate channel. Even with the
limited bandwidth, it is still possible to transmit both engineering and
science data in real-time on the low-rate channel. The second telemetry
channel is a high-rate communication channel that transmits at 128 kbps.
This channel has the bandwidth capacity to transmit engineering, science
and playback data. Both channels are NASA compatible PCM/PSK/PM.
Both telemetry channels utilize fixed-length transfer frames with variable-length
source packets inside the frames. The transfer frame lengths on each channel
are not equal, since each is derived from transmission rate and desired
frame update rate. The desired real-time frame update rate is nominally
2 seconds, a value based solely on the desires of mission operators. This
equates to a frame length of 1024 bits on the low-rate channel. Frame length
selection on the high-rate channel, discussed below, is more involved.
Simple CRC error checking is performed on a frame-by-frame basis, as neither
telemetry stream is Reed-Solomon encoded. Additionally, SNOE will not utilize
the optional transfer frame secondary header. The transfer frame overhead
then equates to a header of 48 bits, a 32-bit trailer for a Frame Acceptance
and Reporting Mechanism (FARM)2, and a 16-bit CRC code, for a total of
96 bits. This leaves a 464 bps real-time bandwidth for data on the low-rate
channel.
Originally, SNOE designers intended to utilize the high-rate channel
solely for playback data. The bandwidth analysis for the high-rate channel
would then be identical to the low-rate. However, if the SNOE team used
the low-rate channel as the only means to a real-time communication link,
telemetering anything but engineering data on the low-rate channel would
effectively choke the bandwidth and cause severely increased engineering
data update delays for the ground crew. In other words, the operations
team would have to settle for either engineering data only, science data
with limited engineering data, or neither during a memory dump. Clearly,
the limited bandwidth on the low-rate channel complicates the downlink.
Therefore, SNOE uses part of the high-rate channel as a "virtual"
low-rate channel for real-time communications. |
|
|
|
|
 |
SOURCE PACKETS
The available bandwidth for each channel is used to hold flexible data
structures called "Source Packets." The SNOE telemetry system
allows for packets to overlap frame boundaries in both the low-rate and
high-rate channels. This unconventional design decision maximizes the bandwidth
use, eliminating the so-called "slop", or unused portion of a
transfer frame. Most telemetry systems steer clear of this technique due
to the fact that a loss of a single frame may affect data in adjacent frames.
The SNOE team can afford this risk since loss of an occasional piece of
data does not cripple the SNOE science objectives. This is a classic example
of a small satellite trade-off that the SNOE engineering team has used
to its advantage.
Pre-defined packet descriptions:
-
Communication Status
use: command verification and comm. link status
update rate: 2 seconds
- Subsystem Status
use: ADCS, instrument status, C&DH parameters
update rate: Spin Period
- General Engineering
use: Temperatures, Power, C&DH Parameters
update: 60 seconds
- Critical Engineering (Contains duplicate items from main three
engineering packets for low-rate channel science telemetry mode)
use: Minimal command verification, comm. link status, power,
ADCS, and C&DH parameters.
update rate: 6 seconds
Programmable Telemetry Packets
Although it is a term typically viewed with trepidation, SNOE uses 'programmable'
telemetry: items in some packets can be selected in a custom manner during
flight. There are two such packets on-board the spacecraft: the Programmable
Rapid Sample Packet and the Programmable Engineering Packet. Each telemetry
item on-board is associated with an ID. These ID's are then used to populate
the programmable packets through ground commands. Both packets limit the
total number of items in each, but neither pre-define the contents of any
'slot' within a packet. The Rapid Sample Packet allows operations personnel
to specify which telemetry ID's, and hence which telemetry items, to sample
as fast as 10 Hz. Due to the high frequency capability, only four items
are allowed at a time. When commanded, the flight software will then sample
the four telemetry items and plac ten consecutive samples of each in the
packet for transmission. The Programmable Engineering Packet allows for
a larger set of items (up to 28) at frequency ranges much lower than the
Rapid Sample Packet. These packets provide a flexible means of de-bugging
problems on the spacecraft, as well as allowing for telemetry arrangements
not anticipated by the pre-defined packets. |
|
snoe@lasp.colorado.edu
|